Skip Navigation Links
Comparing Two Candidates State Senator, District 35
Robert J. “Bob” Lane Joyce Foster
Quality executive experience for 25 years servicing customers and  paying taxes in Colorado. "I have made my living by getting results in the real world!"
"Fresh new ideas and answers!"
Transplanted from the Midwest with her husband. She has been a homemaker, Jewish community service employee, and Denver City Council member.
No "real world" business experience.
47 years old. 65 Years Old.
MBA from CU 
BS in Finance from CSU Pueblo
Attended College
No Degree Attained
Colorado native. Michigan native.
Believes in free market "private sector" solutions to problems. Government is usually "the problem" and not "the solution". Laments the forced departure of liberal senator Ken Gordon because of voter approved "term limits." She is eager to join her "great friend" Bill Ritter to partner up on finding government solutions to problems.
"More Taxes-More Regulations!"
Has a written platform of real world solutions to Colorado's biggest problems called the "Right Changes" contract with the people. Has no written platform. She openly expresses her desire to help Bill Ritter implement his agenda. Does this sound like one party domination and control of your life? Does she have any ideas of her own?
Wants to reallocate government gambling revenues to pay for a  privately insured group "large claim" policy for all non-medicaire Colorado citizens. Individuals and families will be responsible for covering themselves for small claims in a totally re-invigorated free market for supplemental coverages and HSA's. Health care is a private service that should be shopped for and purchased by consumers just like any other product or service.

"We are not the Soviet Union!"
Publically states that : "Healthcare is a basic human right that everyone is entitled to!" She wants to socialize Colorado Healthcare under a single payer system and create a new Colorado income tax to pay for it. Your premium tax will depend upon your federal taxable income. 

This will eliminate your "healthcare choice" in Colorado.
Has creative ideas to increase our energy production including an innovative idea for oil shale processing. Will support all "common sense" reductions in taxes and regulations on oil and gas producers for our largest state industry and job generator. Will go along with Bill Ritter on his already well publicized plans to tax and restrict energy development.
Will work to eliminate Colorado income and property taxes on most small business owners; will make the whole state an "Enterprise Zone"; will dramatically reduce Colorado income taxes on working families with dependent children.

"I will uphold the provisions of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR)."
Will again go along with Bill Ritter (and the democratic majority in both houses) to find creative ways to get around the TABOR restrictions and increase your Colorado taxes. 

Everyone has already heard about the Bill Ritter "Mill Levy Freeze attempt."
Wants Colorado to take responsibility for providing up to four years of college to all qualified Colorado students. He will pay for this from private corporate grants, military grants, bloated endowment funds, and wealthy individual grants. Our colleges need to stop the liberal politicking and execute their primary function of educating students to make it in the "real world." Private industry greatly needs our educated workforce and is willing to help us pay for it. Working families should be freed from the burden of excessive tuition. Speaks of the need to improve the standards in P-20 education following Bill Ritter's outline. She also wants to create an incentive program to hold onto the best teachers. I agree with these measures. She loses me however when she talks about increasing taxes to fund more of the failing  public school programs already in place.
Supports the conduct of a full accountability audit on the "real" allocation of the tax increases that came from Referendum C and other similar increases. This money was supposed to be spent on improving our roads, and bridges, and schools.

"Where did it really go?"

This question needs to be fully answered before we talk about allocating more money for infrastructure and schools.
Talks about the need to increase taxpayer funding for crumbling bridges, roads, and schools. There is no mention of accounting for the effectiveness of past funding measures. Only the urgent need to create new government programs to do more of the same.
Has a totally good business record with no “conflicts of interest.” Believes in the “win-win” philosophy in all business and government transactions and relations. Will enter office with no conflicting family or other outside relationships. Has a record on Denver City Council that has been the subject of close scrutiny. The most immediately notable is the recently highlighted involvement of her and her lobbyist son in some of the competitive negotiations  for DIA parking contracts. This came up in her primary election battle. How does a city council post serve as preparation for a state Senate post? Isn’t this a totally different job?
This election will give the voters of senate district 35 and Colorado a clear cut choice. Will we choose the path of more freedom and growth or the other path of higher taxes and government socialism?
Government only exists because we pay for its existence with our taxes. " Government exists only to serve us!"